+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Animal Health Act

  1. #1
    Dennis Lapierre
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Falkland, BC
    Posts
    275
    Blog Entries
    13

    Animal Health Act

    This Act was introduced for first reading yesterday.

    http://www.leg.bc.ca/39th4th/1st_read/gov37-1.htm

    Note the power of the Chief Veterinarian, the confidentiality obligations, the cost (and cost recovery) procedures, and the right to enter private property (absent residences) without the need for a warrant.

    Comments?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Victoria BC
    Posts
    11

    Enactment of regulations like these brings us a lot closer to being a Police State than the average citizen will realize. until it is too late.

    The chief veterinarian should have no special powers and nor should any enforcement officer. Cost recovery is a matter for a court to decide.

  3. #3

    It has been almost a month since this bill was first read in the house. It stands to stifle all citizens of free speech. It was picked up by the Province on Thursday May 24th. Why is this forum not foaming at the mouth? (or have we already been stifled)?
    Industry is suggesting, it is a trivial bill, and only the "warped" are reacting to it in an emotional way??
    Where are the comments? What is BCAC going to do to stop this bill from becoming law? I thought the buzz word was "transparency"?

  4. #4
    Dennis Lapierre
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Falkland, BC
    Posts
    275
    Blog Entries
    13

    The following release was issued yesterday by the Minister of Agriculture on the matter:

    OPINION-EDITORIAL

    Animal Health Act improves disease control

    By Don McRae
    Minister of Agriculture
    May 25, 2012


    VICTORIA – I would like to clarify provisions within the new Animal Health Act and allay concerns expressed by some, specifically around privacy issues and disclosure of disease outbreaks.

    To be clear, the rules on reporting news of a disease outbreak do not change with the new Animal Health Act. As soon as a disease is actually confirmed, that information would be made public just the same way it has always been, typically through the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Fisheries and Oceans Canada or the Province’s chief veterinarian.

    What the new Animal Health Act guards against is incomplete or unconfirmed information being made public that would unfairly harm the reputation and livelihood of the families that make their living as farmers. We recognize that upon confirmation of a disease it is essential the public receives complete, accurate, and consistent information and advice on how they can protect their health.

    The best way to ensure that disease outbreaks are reported early is to assure farmers that their information will be treated in a strictly confidential fashion.

    Section 16 of the new Animal Health Act is actually designed to encourage the reporting of potential animal diseases and participation in traceability programs, by guaranteeing the confidentiality of the information. It simply makes animal medical records held by the Province protected by the same confidentiality rules that apply to private veterinarians and private laboratories. The wording is very similar to that used by Alberta and Ontario.

    The new legislation places no specific restrictions on the media or individuals from reporting the presence of diseases to the public. It also does not change anyone’s responsibility to notify CFIA or the Province’s chief veterinarian if they have reason to believe that an animal in their care has a reportable disease.

    To that end, the restriction on disclosure of animal health information provided in confidence only applies to a “person engaged in the administration of the act”, for example inspectors and government employees directly involved in animal health. It does not apply to journalists or other members of the public.

    The Animal Health Act is a rewrite of a bill that was originally passed in 1948. The act was rewritten based on best practices and similar legislation in other provinces. The changes bring us up-to-date so that we have the tools to protect human and animal health while ensuring our producers can compete in the global marketplace, as animal health has become a major global trade issue.

    Under the act, as well as federal legislation, people with knowledge of a reportable disease are legally obligated to provide that information to provincial and/or federal authorities. Failure to do so is an offence.

    Maximum fines under the act have been increased to $75,000 because animal disease control is a serious matter, as an outbreak has potentially devastating consequences to human health as well as the health and welfare of animals. The penalties are designed to ensure people responsible for the health of animals take that responsibility seriously. This maximum fine applies upon conviction only to certain offences that are prosecuted through the courts.

    Proposed changes to the Animal Health Act will ensure B.C.’s reputation as a producer of safe and healthy foods and animals. The changes would help prevent the spread of animal disease as well as improving the response to a potential outbreak.

    I assure you that the new act balances the need for protection of confidential information in the ministry’s possession with the public interest in receiving timely disease information.

    Journalists and other concerned citizens can also take solace in knowing their right to report on animal disease occurrences is guaranteed within section 2 of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


    Connect with the Province of B.C. at: www.gov.bc.ca/connect

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts